A materiality matrix is a chart that places sustainability topics on two axes, usually the impact your company has on people and the environment and the financial effect the topic has on your company. Topics that pass the threshold on either axis are material under double materiality; in the classic version the top-right corner holds the priorities. Build it from a long list of topics, scored with evidence and checked with stakeholders, and have management approve it.
What a materiality matrix is
A materiality matrix is a chart that places sustainability topics on two axes to show which ones matter most. In the classic version, one axis shows how important a topic is to stakeholders and the other how important it is to the business. In the double materiality version, one axis shows the company’s impact on people and the environment, and the other the financial effect the topic has on the company.
The matrix is a way to present the result of a materiality assessment, not the assessment itself. Neither the European reporting standards nor the GRI Standards require the picture; they require the assessment and an explanation of how it was done.
The steps
A materiality assessment that holds up follows the same order.
- Understand your business: activities, sites, value chain and the people affected.
- Draw up a long list of topics, for example from the European reporting standards or the VSME.
- Score each topic’s impact on people and the environment, with evidence.
- Score each topic’s financial effect on the company: risks and opportunities.
- Ask stakeholders, such as employees, customers, suppliers, banks and neighbours, to check the scores.
- Set a threshold, plot the matrix and have management approve the result.
- Write down the method, the sources and who was consulted.
How to score
Use a simple scale, for example 1 to 5. For a negative impact, look at its severity: how serious it is, how many people or how much of the environment it affects, and how hard it is to put right. For an impact that has not happened yet, also weigh how likely it is. For the financial axis, combine how large the effect on costs, revenue or financing could be with how likely it is.
Base the scores on facts where you can: your carbon footprint, accident figures, complaints, customer requirements, energy costs. A score that rests only on opinion is hard to defend.
Reading the matrix
Draw a threshold line on each axis. Under double materiality, a topic is material if it passes the threshold on either axis: a large impact on people or the environment is enough, even if it costs the company nothing yet. In the classic matrix, the topics in the top-right corner are the priorities. Material topics need a policy, actions, targets and figures in your report.
When you do not need one
The EU voluntary standard (VSME) does not ask for a materiality assessment. It asks you to report each disclosure if it applies to your business. A matrix is still useful to choose the priorities of your strategy, but it is not a reporting requirement for a VSME report.
Doing it in Greener Ahead
Sustainability reporting in Greener Ahead follows the VSME, which uses the “if applicable” test rather than a materiality assessment: it shows only the disclosures that apply to your business and records why the others do not. It costs €995 per year with unlimited users, and you can try it free for 14 days without a card. Check the pricing page for current details.
Example scores
Scores for a fictional printing company on a scale of 1 to 5, with a threshold of 3 on either axis.
| Topic | Impact on people and environment | Financial effect on the company | Material? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy and emissions | 4 | 4 | Yes |
| Paper and other resources | 4 | 3 | Yes |
| Inks and chemicals | 3 | 2 | Yes, on impact |
| Health and safety | 4 | 3 | Yes |
| Training and skills | 2 | 3 | Yes, on financial effect |
| Biodiversity | 2 | 1 | No |
| Data protection | 2 | 2 | No |
Mistakes that make a matrix useless
Readers and auditors notice these quickly.
- Every topic ends up material.
- Scores based on opinion without evidence.
- Only management was consulted.
- Impact and financial effect mixed on one axis.
- Done once and never updated.
Sources and scope
- EUR-Lex: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, European Sustainability Reporting Standards
- GRI: the GRI Standards
- European Commission: 2025 VSME recommendation and standard
These resources explain a preparation workflow. Check your selected standard and recipient requirements before sharing your report.





















